Jump to content


Photo

PROPS......2018 MB B52 23' 440


  • Please log in to reply
145 replies to this topic

#1 shadowrider

shadowrider

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 29 April 2018 - 06:47 AM

Wanting to know what prop everyone is running on there 2018 B52 23'?  I am at 5000' and have the 440. Plug and play 1100 bags and surf pipe, which I hear effects rpms slightly.

 

I have the 2775 prop.  I have determined I need way more pitch.  I am thinking 2247 is what I need, but I am thinking I need even more than that? Anyone running more pitch than a 2247?  Anyone running a 2277, what motor? 


  • DerPeaws likes this

#2 OrangeTJ

OrangeTJ

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 848 posts
  • LocationNorthern CA
  • Hometown Lake:Folsom Lake

Posted 29 April 2018 - 09:07 AM

I don't have a B52 23, so this may be less helpful. On my 16 F22 with 400 (so, a lighter boat with a bit less power) I ran a 2277 up at Lake Tahoe at 6200 feet.  2277 was great for wakeboarding and cruising (could hit WOT and 40 mph with 12 people in the boat). However, loaded for surfing (my prefered surfing setup amounts to about 4500 lbs, with about 600 of that in the bow) it struggled to reach and hold 11.6.    No way it would have planed out with all that ballast...but I don't run that way anyway.  Conversely, with a 2249 on, it would pull full ballast to surf speed without much issue.  Ultimately, I ended up going for a 2279, which is same diameter and pitch as 2277 but with less cup.  I haven't tried it on Tahoe but so far at lower elevations up to about 4,000 it has been great.  My point is that a 2277 might be the upper limit on your larger boat at your elevation but a 2247 should be workable and will get you several more mph at any given RPM than will the 2775.


  • sand2snow, Tbag and shadowrider like this

#3 OrangeTJ

OrangeTJ

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 848 posts
  • LocationNorthern CA
  • Hometown Lake:Folsom Lake

Posted 29 April 2018 - 09:17 AM

Does the new B52 have sufficient clearance to run a 15.5” prop? Thst wouldnopen up some options, too.

#4 shadowrider

shadowrider

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 29 April 2018 - 09:21 AM

?  Currently the 2775 is a 15" and it is 1" from hull.  How close can you get until you have issues?



#5 OrangeTJ

OrangeTJ

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 848 posts
  • LocationNorthern CA
  • Hometown Lake:Folsom Lake

Posted 29 April 2018 - 09:30 AM

I have heard .75" as a rule of thumb for minimum clearance on wake boats.  However, I'd ask that question of the people at ACME for your specific application.  In my case, I was considering a 15.5" for my F22 but it would have resulted in about 5/8" clearance so I was just a little worried and didn't go there.



#6 MXGUY741

MXGUY741

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 303 posts
  • LocationPortland or
  • Hometown Lake:10th st

Posted 29 April 2018 - 10:46 AM

anyone run a 2349 on b52/f22 400hp?



#7 OrangeTJ

OrangeTJ

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 848 posts
  • LocationNorthern CA
  • Hometown Lake:Folsom Lake

Posted 29 April 2018 - 01:14 PM

Don’t see that one in the ACME listing. What are the specs?

#8 Racer808

Racer808

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 651 posts
  • LocationDenver
  • Hometown Lake:All over

Posted 30 April 2018 - 04:34 AM

Acme 2951 (15x10.5) is my choice of weapon at a mile high.  However, I am not sure what your tranny ratio is.  I believe another member here has a 17 with the new tranny ratio & he runs the 2937 (15x11) 



#9 bloodiestcadaver

bloodiestcadaver

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 550 posts
  • Locationutah
  • Hometown Lake:Lake Powell/ East canyon/Jordanelle/Rockport

Posted 30 April 2018 - 09:07 AM

2247 will be my choice, i have the 2775 with the 440 b52 23 at 5900 ft. I just need to get some mula first  ;)

I havent experienced it but from all the prop talk I think the 2247 is going to be nice for us high elevation guys


  • shadowrider likes this

#10 shadowrider

shadowrider

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 30 April 2018 - 09:38 AM

2247 will be my choice, i have the 2775 with the 440 b52 23 at 5900 ft. I just need to get some mula first  ;)

I havent experienced it but from all the prop talk I think the 2247 is going to be nice for us high elevation guys

Okay so I just sold my 2775 and bought a 2247.  I will report back how it does but I am guessing 2247 will be much closer, but I am thinking may need slightly more pitch than the 2247.  I see your in Utah.  I may take my 2247, once I test it, and have the Prop doc in orem help add some more pitch to the 2247 if its still not enough. 


  • bloodiestcadaver and Jeffsullj like this

#11 bloodiestcadaver

bloodiestcadaver

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 550 posts
  • Locationutah
  • Hometown Lake:Lake Powell/ East canyon/Jordanelle/Rockport

Posted 30 April 2018 - 12:24 PM

Okay so I just sold my 2775 and bought a 2247.  I will report back how it does but I am guessing 2247 will be much closer, but I am thinking may need slightly more pitch than the 2247.  I see your in Utah.  I may take my 2247, once I test it, and have the Prop doc in orem help add some more pitch to the 2247 if its still not enough. 

Thats cool i had no idea you could modify the prop. Yea let me know how it goes! i was going to post up my current readings yesterday but i launced for about 30 min at jordanelle but it was too choppy and rainy so i just loaded up and went home, sadly. 



#12 Tbag

Tbag

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationPNW
  • Hometown Lake:Sawyer

Posted 30 April 2018 - 12:42 PM

Anyone running a 15.5" prop?



#13 meetloaf13

meetloaf13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 763 posts
  • LocationSE Idaho
  • Hometown Lake:Ririe Reservoir

Posted 30 April 2018 - 12:55 PM

What transmission ratio?

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk



#14 Tbag

Tbag

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationPNW
  • Hometown Lake:Sawyer

Posted 30 April 2018 - 01:13 PM

Any trans ratio I'm just concerned about clearance. I have one inch clearence now. As noted elsewhere I have read 3/4" is the min. Seems we should all be running 15.5" props if they fit and no one seems to using them. I don't want to be the first.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk



#15 MWCasper

MWCasper

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 246 posts
  • LocationClarkston, Michigan
  • Hometown Lake:Union Lake (938' A.S.L.)

Posted 30 April 2018 - 01:42 PM

I'm considering it.  Boat doesn't come out of storage for another couple of weeks - need to take some measurements.  Acme advised 3/4" minimum clearance to avoid gelcoat burn.  Anybody else running a 15.5" ??? 


  • Tbag likes this

-Aaron

2017 MB B52 23WB

GBL or GBD...


#16 Tbag

Tbag

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationPNW
  • Hometown Lake:Sawyer

Posted 03 May 2018 - 11:17 AM

Talked to acme they say no problem running 15.5" props on our boats and they they say it will improve efficiency and fuel economy. I now have a 2849 on order. I'll let you know how it compares to the 2247. I'm happy with the 2247, but I want a backup prop and figured I could go a little bigger with my everyday prop for lake Wa.

Edit - i should mention he said it's possible you could see some gel coat burning running 3/4" clearance with the 550 but no concern with the 400/440
  • bloodiestcadaver likes this

#17 OrangeTJ

OrangeTJ

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 848 posts
  • LocationNorthern CA
  • Hometown Lake:Folsom Lake

Posted 03 May 2018 - 12:27 PM

Can’t wait to hear a report on the 15.5”! I know reports on themalibucrew have been very positive.
  • NewMelon likes this

#18 MidnightMax

MidnightMax

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,678 posts
  • LocationVancouver WA
  • Hometown Lake:Columbia River

Posted 03 May 2018 - 03:38 PM

That 2849 has a lot of pitch at 15.5”

I would like to try a 2923 (15.5 x 13.0)

#19 Tbag

Tbag

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationPNW
  • Hometown Lake:Sawyer

Posted 03 May 2018 - 04:13 PM

15.5" pitch which is only 1.25" more pitch than the 2247 prop I'm running now and it has less cup. The acme tech calculated that my rpms would go down by 200. He was actually thinking I might want to go the other way and add a little more cup to the 2849. Shit hope I'm not wasting a pile of money on bad info from acme.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk


#20 Tbag

Tbag

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationPNW
  • Hometown Lake:Sawyer

Posted 03 May 2018 - 04:23 PM

I don't have a lot of experience with changing diameter but he was saying larger diameter is #1 then go to pitch and cup last. Which i suppose makes your point. Hopefully his calcs are correct. He was really selling the larger diameter as a big upgrade for our heavily weighted boats at slowish speeds. For Max top speeds apparently you want to minimize diameter





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users